Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

This assignment is of software Engineering class/ Ethics.Its about ethical thinking, so this assignment is to reflect on topics found on this...

1 answer below »



Purpose


To experience developing an organized system from scratch. To experience working with a group to develop a full organizing system including the use of taxonomies and/or controlled vocabularies as well as encoding of metadata.


Description


You will need to work with a group for this project. Please identify two to three individuals with whom you can work on this project. You will need to share your collaborative document with me.


Develop an organizing system to organize material on a website for a resource collection of your choice. Here are a few resource schemas you may consider using:



  1. Recipe [https://schema.org/RecipeLinks to an external site.

    ]

  2. Music Recording [https://schema.org/MusicRecordingLinks to an external site.

    ]

  3. Drug [https://schema.org/DrugLinks to an external site.

    ]

  4. Video Game [https://schema.org/VideoGameLinks to an external site.

    ]

  5. Vehicle [https://schema.org/VehicleLinks to an external site.

    ]

  6. Dublin Core (General Purpose) [https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/Links to an external site.

    ]


Alternatively, you may choose your own topic and use the Dublin Core Schema and Omeka to set up your organized system. Your organizing system should include the selection of appropriate elements from the schema, the development of a basic taxonomy, and the selection or development of appropriate controlled vocabularies for names of persons and organizations (even when not specifically required in the schema), as well as appropriate controlled vocabulary formatting, for dates, languages and identifiers where required or recommended by the schema.


Your completed project should include:



  • a front page listing the members of the group

  • a discussion of the design decisions you must make for this system to be efficient and effective.


You will develop a demo to show how your system would work in practice. While your demonstration does not need to be a fully working website or model, you should include a working faceted taxonomy and metadata encodings corresponding to at least three (3) of your created metadata records. You may use paper mockups or slides to demonstrate how the system would work.


You may use an existing digital library tool such as Omeka, code a demo yourself in HTML, use a website builder, or create a slide presentation/video showing how your system would work.


Your project must include the following:


1) a page discussing design decisions [This should include answering the questions posed herehttps://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/tdo4p/chapter/design-decisions-in-organizing-systems-introduction/Links to an external site.

]


2) a minimum of 10 metadata records for your selected resources formatted according to the example shown in the table below (your metadata record should use a minimum of 8 elements/properties) [skill learned in Assignment 3]:







































































Metadata Element

Value

Content/Vocabulary Standard for Formatting


dc.title



The Discipline of Organizing: 4thProfessional Edition






dc.creator



Glushko, Robert J.



LCNAF




dc.subject



Information organization.



LCSH




dc.description



This textbook takes a multi-disciplinary approach to the field of information organization.






dc.publisher



Glushko, Robert J.






dc.contributor








dc.date



XXXXXXXXXX



W3CDTF




dc.type



Text



DCMI-Type




dc.format



application/pdf



IMT




dc.identifier



XXXXXXXXXX






dc.source



https://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/tdo4p/






dc.language



en



ISO 639-2




NB. Since you will be using schema.org your property/element names will not be the same as shown in the table, since that uses Dublin Core


3) validated metadata encoding in rdf/xml or json for three (3) of your metadata records [See Week 11 Module]


4) the identification and use of established controlled vocabularies for names of persons and organizations (Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authority_controlLinks to an external site.

) and for all elements where a content standard is recommended or required for a property by the schema eg. language, date. [See Week 5 module]


5) the set of interactions you will enable on your site (these can be built into the system or you can demonstrate how you would like it to work) [Seehttps://berkeley.pressbooks.pub/tdo4p/chapter/designing-resource-based-interactions/Links to an external site.

],


5) a hierarchical taxonomy that will support organization of your resources and at least three facets to enable filtering of the search results. [skill learned in Assignment 4 and Week 10 module]


6) demo/overview of how your website would look with enabled taxonomy and results displayed


NOTE:


It is recommended that you work with at least one other person on this project. Because it is very important to experience issues involving lack of consensus for taxonomy or controlled vocabulary development during this project. A student who would prefer to work alone must reach out to me for agreement first and must also write an additional short paper which will compare their system to a similar system for a similar experience.



Submission Components:



  1. Submit a single pdf document or presentation which combines these elements of your organized system. You may present the document as slides (with or without voice) as you desire.Do not use Prezi or any similar tool.


    1. one page discussing design decisions


    2. 10 metadata records


    3. 3 validated encoded metadata records (rdf/xml, json)


    4. mock ups of interactions showing how they are enabled


    5. full faceted taxonomy that organizes resources and supports search and browse


    6. demo/overview of how your website would look with enabled taxonomy and results displayed


    7. final page providing summary of the work done, decisions made, challenges, disagreements and resolutions, and any final thoughts. (Include a link to your collaborative document on this final page, be sure permissions are set appropriately for me to view this document)




  2. Students who are working alone should add an additional document, 400 words, comparing their system to an existing system on a similar topic/with a similar function. If you work in a group, you will have the chance to discuss issues of compromise and consensus that a solo project will miss. Comparing your system to an existing system will still allow you to experience and discuss some of these issues.


Group Sign Up


Group membership is a self enroll, you will not be randomly assigned. Do the following:



  • Please identify the Final Project Group Sets and self-sign up with one of the available groups. Instructions for self-sign up may be foundat this linkLinks to an external site.

    . (If you choose to work alone, please contact me for permission and so that I might set up Canvas to accept your work.)

  • Create a collaborative document (Microsoft Word or Google Docs) in which you will all be working and share that file with me.

  • Please use one page of the collaborative document to outline tasks and how you will be dividing those tasks between group members.

  • Please add a notation if a group member fails to complete their assigned and agreed on tasks.







Rubric





Final Project Rubric




























































Final Project Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts




This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Discussion of Design Decisions
Project has one page with a discussion of design decisions.


















2pts

Full Marks

Design decisions include all the organizing questions along with appropriate answers and considerations for each.








1pts

Partial Marks

Some elements of design decisions were not discussed or more thorough discussion is needed in elements mentioned.








0pts

No Marks

No discussion of design decisions present or discussion is lacking to the point where meaningful assessment is impossible.






2pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Metadata Records
Project includes the required amount of metadata records


















3
to >2.0
pts

Full Marks

10 or more metadata records provided








2
to >0.0
pts

Partial Marks

Less than 10 metadata records provided.








0pts

No Marks

No sample records provided.






3pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Schema
Appropriate schema applied to records


















2pts

Full Marks

Excellent use of chosen metadata schema.








1pts

Partial Marks

Some issues with your schema (not a schema, schema not well described, schema not well implemented)








0pts

No Marks

No schema used.






2pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Controlled Vocabulary
Excellent selection and use of controlled vocabulary for value and formatting of schema properties.


















2pts

Full Marks

Excellent description of controlled vocabulary and correct application to properties shown across the organizing system.








1pts

Partial Marks

Reasonable description of selection and use of vocabularies however some properties that should have used a controlled vocabulary do not or formatting rules for the content standard are ignored or not applied correctly.








0pts

No Marks

No controlled vocabulary used or no explanation of why it was chosen or how applied.






2pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Encoded Records
Project includes the required amount of metadata records


















3
to >2.0
pts

Full Marks

3 or more encoded metadata records in json or xml








2
to >0.0
pts

Partial Marks

Less than 3 encoded records or serious problems noted - such as invalid xml or json








0pts

No Marks

No encoded metadata records submitted.






3pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Taxonomy
Taxonomy Design and Diagram


















3
to >2.0
pts

Full Marks

Full faceted taxonomy that organizes resources and supports search and browse, excellent taxonomy diagram and identification of taxonomy levels, categories and facets.








2
to >0.0
pts

Partial Marks

Good start. However, your taxonomy diagram needed more layers/ no facets mentioned which would help to refine search supported by the taxonomy/ diagram is confusing and hard to follow








0pts

No Marks

No taxonomy presented.






3pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demo System with Interactions
Demo/Wireframe demonstrating interactions.


















4
to >3.0
pts

Full Marks

Excellent Demo. Demo is interactive or clearly provides sufficient evidence through screenshots/images to indicate how interactions would take place. [Example: search, sort, filter, rate, comment, popular, etc]








3
to >0.0
pts

Partial Marks

Good demo. Demo provides a good description of how the system would work but could be enhanced with additional screenshots or explanations.








0pts

No Marks

No demo/wireframe provided.






4pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Final Summary Report Page
Report describing the system (including this page and first page, as well as others in document should be 800 words).
If you worked alone, there should be an individual 400 page report comparing your system to another system.


















5
to >3.0
pts

Full Marks

Excellent report which describes the process of designing your system and implementing the demo system.








3
to >0.0
pts

Partial Marks

Good report which describes the process of designing your system, however more detail would be invaluable.








0pts

No Marks

Report Missing






5pts






This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Formatting
Appropriate style used (APA, MLA). Name of authors listed and references included. Grammar and Spelling appropriate.


















1pts

Full Marks

Format follows standard style guidelines, author names and references supplied. Correct grammar and spelling used. Excellent writing and communication of concepts.








0.5pts

Partial Marks

Some issues with style, grammar, or spelling.








0pts

No Marks

Answer is hard to understand due to writing style. The Writing Center (http://www4.uwm.edu/writingcenter/) can provide assistance with writing.






1pts



Answered 1 days After Sep 18, 2024

Solution

Shubham answered on Sep 19 2024
6 Votes
Question 1
1. Utilitarianism
· What do you like about it?
Utilitarianism appeals because of straightforward and outcome-based approach to ethics. It focuses on maximizing happiness and making decisions based on benefit for greatest number of people.
· What do you dislike about it?
The downside of utilitarianism is justification for unethical actions as long as it benefits majority (Stevenson, 2021). It could lead to neglecting minority rights and justify harmful actions like lying and coercion that depends on end result that is greater happiness for people.
· How could you apply it in real life?
Utilitarianism can be applied in decisions related to resource allocation like healthcare. In case of pandemic, distributing vaccines can help to maximize public health is the utilitarian approach.
2. Rights
· What do you like about it?
The Rights theory focuses on individual freedoms and protections. It is important for safety against tyranny and oppression. It includes values like personal autonomy and ensures that basic rights like freedom of speech, privacy and equality are considered.
· What do you dislike about it?
The major limitation of Rights theory is tendency to create conflicts between individual rights and collective needs. The right to free speech of person might depends on another person right. The excessive focus on individual rights can lead to selfishness along with societal responsibilities and common good that are ignored.
· How could you apply it in real life?
Rights theory can be applied in the workplace to ensure that employees are treated fairly and respectfully. For example, companies can enforce policies that protect workers' rights to privacy and non-discrimination.
3. Justice
· What do you like about it?
Justice theory focuses fairness and equality that can makes it strong ethical framework for creating social equity. It focuses on treating people equally and ensuring that resources, opportunities and privileges are distributed in equal way.
· What do you dislike about it?
The drawback of Justice theory is that it can be difficult to define about fair practice. Different people and cultures have different definitions of fairness that can lead to disagreements (De Roeck and Farooq, 2018).
· How could you apply it in real life?
Justice theory can be applied in education for policies that are implemented to ensure...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Looking For Homework Help? Get Help From Best Experts!

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here